Appendix F: Theoretical Consideration of the Potential Perturbation Induced by Localized Surface Charge



next up previous contents
Next: F.1 Local Potential Perturbation Up: PhD Thesis Predrag Habas Previous: Appendix E: Analytical Modeling of

Appendix F

Theoretical Consideration of the Potential Perturbation Induced by Localized Surface Charge

 

In Section 3.5 we have found that the shift on the voltage axis produced by a localized interface charge is smaller than that corresponding to a uniform interface charge (demonstrated in Figure 3.24). A rigorous analytical formulation of this effect is introduced in this appendix. The theoretical expressions are compared with the two-dimensional numerical calculations. Agreement and deviations between analytical and numerical models are argued in detail.

It is not possible to develope a rigorous analytical model of this effect in the general case. For instance, the effect is also influenced by the current flow. When adopting vanishing minority and majority-carrier currents, the problem reduces to the Poisson equation solely, which is a nonlinear equation upon the potential. For the charge pumping conditions considered in Section 3.5, the carrier concentrations at the interface typically satisfy the inequalities: , , where is the bulk doping. Motivated by this fact, in order to be able to derive a theoretical expression, a total depletion approximation is assumed to hold in the active part of the bulk. A possible influence of the moving charge will be noted when comparing theory with numerical results.

Two problems can be formulated:

It is worth to stress that, although similar at glance, these two viewpoints are not equivalent to each other. For example, the width of the depletion region changes comparing the absence and the presence of the traps in the latter problem, contrary to the former problem, where it remains almost the same in both cases. To interpret typical measurements of the voltage shift in the engineering practice, like measurements mentioned in Section 3.5, the second problem is the one to be dealt with.

 





next up previous contents
Next: F.1 Local Potential Perturbation Up: PhD Thesis Predrag Habas Previous: Appendix E: Analytical Modeling of



Martin Stiftinger
Sat Oct 15 22:05:10 MET 1994