6.1.2 Worst Case Condition Calculations



next up previous contents index
Next: 6.1.3 Corner Parameter Values Up: 6.1 Statistically Based Worst Previous: 6.1.1 Device Variation Analysis

6.1.2 Worst Case Condition Calculations

Previous worst case characterization techniques involved the anding of all independent parameters to determine the worst case values of an objective function. The probability of the occurrence of the anding   conditions is very low. Imposing such pessimistic variation requirement   on the circuit design leads to overdesign and strict constraints on its performance. Furthermore, such an approach ignores the inherent correlation that exists between the main input variables. It is a well known fact that the statistical variables of the P- and N-channel MOSFET's in a CMOS technology are strongly correlated as these parameters   are determined by the same fabrication steps. In a similar manner to the procedure described in the previous section, one can generate the predicted and distributions based on the assumed statistical variable distributions. As the target values for the key parameters are usually knowngif, one can scale the previous generation distributions assuming variance scales in proportion to mean to estimate the expected key statistical parameter distributions.  

The mean and standard deviation of the and distributions can be calculated from the resulting joint probability distribution function (jpdf). Any meaningful statement about the and variation must be a statistical one and requires a preassigned probability level . As an illustration, the predicted statistical distributions of a 0.5m CMOS technology is plotted in Fig. 6.1 together with the limit contour. This corresponds to a 99.7% confidence level that the   manufactured MOSFET currents will be within this contour. One can apply this limit to calculate the characteristics values of and corresponding to slow, typical, and fast conditions. Specifically:

where and are the mean values, and are the standard deviation determined from the simulated distribution; The subscripts , , and denote the typical center of the design area, and its high and low current corners respectively.

 
Figure 6.1: Simulated and distributions for a m CMOS technology.  

This statistical modeling capabilities provide the necessary framework for engineering parameter tolerances to specify the acceptable design space. By defining appropriate design objective criteria, other worst case conditions can also be defined. For example, the skewed corners corresponding to the mismatch conditions between the N-channel and P-channel currents can be determined by applying the same approach to generate the distribution of the current ratio:

which is calculated using the polynomial expressions in (6.2). Again, the mismatch corner conditions can be calculated as the limits of :

Where and are the mean and standard deviation of , and the and subscripts denote the fast N and slow P (FS), and slow N fast P corners respectively.



next up previous contents index
Next: 6.1.3 Corner Parameter Values Up: 6.1 Statistically Based Worst Previous: 6.1.1 Device Variation Analysis



Martin Stiftinger
Tue Aug 1 19:07:20 MET DST 1995