previous up next contents Previous: 10.1.1 I-V curves Up: 10.1 Comparison of Simulation Next: 10.1.3 Carrier Density

10.1.2 Current Density

The current density in the WFM is only constant, if the discrete formula for the calculation is chosen according to the discretization of the free operator. With the appropriate discretization the resulting current density comes out constant, now matter how crude the mesh is.

In Fig. 10.2 we depict the current density at the simulated maximum bias of $ 0.4 \mathrm{V}$, if we calculate it pointwise according to the ``naive'' formula

$\displaystyle j_i = \frac{e \hbar} {2 \pi m_0} \sum k f(x_i,k) \triangle k   .$ (10.1)

The straight line depicts the current derived from the ``correct'' discrete formula for first order upwinding

$\displaystyle j_{i+1/2} = \frac{e \hbar} {2 \pi m_0} \left( \sum_+ k^+ f(x_i,k^+) + \sum_- k^- f(x_{i+1},k^-) \right) \triangle k$ (10.2)

where the two parts of the sum stem from negative and positive values of $ k$ respectively.

Near the barriers the naive current density is far from constant and varies rapidly. Naive conservation of mass is severely violated and the current flows even backwards. It is seen that this property is very sensitive on the discretization as the mesh is too coarse. We note that for the I-V curves the current was calculated with the ``correct'' (conserved) formula.

Figure 10.2: Wigner simulation: Comparing ``naive'' and ``correct'' formula for current density at maximum bias
\includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth
]{Figures/jcompMax2}

previous up next contents Previous: 10.1.1 I-V curves Up: 10.1 Comparison of Simulation Next: 10.1.3 Carrier Density


R. Kosik: Numerical Challenges on the Road to NanoTCAD