« PreviousUpNext »Contents
Previous: 3 Experimental Characterization    Top: 3 Experimental Characterization    Next: 3.3 Capacitance-Voltage Profiling (C-V)

3.2 Charge Pumping (CP)

Figure 3.4:  Experimental setup for the CP technique: The gate is pulsed by a generator between accumulation and inversion while the source to substrate and drain to substrate diodes are slightly reverse biased (\( V_\mathrm {R} \)). Simultaneously, the charge pumping current (\( I_\mathrm {CP} \)) is measured.

The CP effect was reported in 1969 for the first time [109]. One milestone in the development of this technique was the investigation and explanation of the method in 1984 [110]. The CP technique is a reliable and precise method for the measurement of defects at the substrate/oxide interface of a MOSFET. Thus, it is often used for the characterization of HCD, which is typically associated with an increase of such defects. The corresponding experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 3.4 and the schematic measurement procedure in Figure 3.5. The gate is pulsed by a generator between accumulation, in case of an nMOSFET defined by the low level of the gate voltage (\( V_\mathrm {GL} \)) smaller than the flatband voltage (\( V_\mathrm {FB} \)), and inversion, defined by the high level of the gate voltage (\( V_\mathrm {GH} \)) higher than \( V_{\mathrm {th}} \). The source to substrate and drain to substrate diodes are slightly reverse biased. Simultaneously, the bulk current (\( I_\mathrm {B} \)), which consists of leakage currents of the reverse biased diodes and the \( I_\mathrm {CP} \), is measured.

Figure 3.5:  Schematic illustration of the charge pumping effect: \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) is measured as a change of \( I_\mathrm {B} \) when sweeping \( V_\mathrm {G} \) between inversion and accumulation back and forth. \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) corresponds to the recombination cur- rent of trapped minority carriers and majority carriers and is a measure for the interface charge density.

The occurrence of \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) can be explained by the recombination of majority carriers with minority carriers. A schematic illustration of the gate pulse and the corresponding \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) is shown in Figure 3.5. When the pulse level is in the inversion phase (pulse level at \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)), a thin layer in the substrate near the interface (channel) is depleted of the majority carriers and populated by minority carriers. This leads to a trapping of some of them by existing interface defects. As soon as the pulse drives the MOSFET into accumulation (pulse level at \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)), the minority carriers leave the channel and the majority carriers flood it. Simultaneously, some of the interface defects with energies close to the valence band or conduction band can emit their trapped charges by thermal emission before the accumulation phase is reached due to the finite rising and falling slopes. These minority carriers are pushed into the substrate while switching to the accumulation phase without any contribution to \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) because the overall amount of positive and negative charges is not changed throughout this process. By contrast, all other trapped minority carriers recombine with the majority carriers in accumulation, which gives rise to a net flow of charge into the substrate. This can be measured as \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) and is directly proportional to the pulse frequency and the mean interface-state density. In the accumulation phase, some of the majority carriers are trapped by interface defects. Driving the MOSFET back into inversion results in a similar process as described for the transition from inversion to accumulation but with opposite carrier types.

As a consequence of the thermal emission of carriers during the rising and falling edge of the pulse, only interface defects within a particular energy range around midgap, which is smaller than the entire silicon bandgap, can be measured in \( I_\mathrm {B} \). The energy boundaries in the lower and upper half of the bandgap, defining the active energy interval, are given by [111]

(3.5–3.6) \{begin}{align} \label {eq:boundaryl} E_\mathrm {em,h}&=E_\mathrm {i}(T) - k_\mathrm {B}T \mathrm {ln}\left (v_\mathrm {th}(T)\sigma
_\mathrm {p}n_\mathrm {i}(T) \dfrac {V_\mathrm {th}-V_\mathrm {FB}}{\Delta V_\mathrm {G}} t_\mathrm {r}\right )\\ \label {eq:boundaryh} E_\mathrm {em,e}&=E_\mathrm {i}(T) + k_\mathrm {B}T \mathrm
{ln}\left (v_\mathrm {th}(T)\sigma _\mathrm {n}n_\mathrm {i}(T) \dfrac {V_\mathrm {th}-V_\mathrm {FB}}{\Delta V_\mathrm {G}} t_\mathrm {f}\right ) \{end}{align}

with

\( E_\mathrm {em,h} \) / \( E_\mathrm {em,e} \) boundary in the lower / upper half of the bandgap
\( E_\mathrm {i} \) intrinsic Fermi level
\( t_\mathrm {r} \) / \( t_\mathrm {f} \) pulse rise / fall time
\( \Delta V_\mathrm {G} \) pulse amplitude
\( v_\mathrm {th} \) thermal drift velocity
\( \sigma _\mathrm {p} \) / \( \sigma _\mathrm {n} \) capture cross section for holes / electrons
\( n_\mathrm {i} \) intrinsic carrier concentration.

Figure 3.6:  Effective channel length: Due to lateral doping profile the local \( V_{\mathrm {th}} \) and \( V_\mathrm {FB} \) differs along the channel. Depending on \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) and \( V_\mathrm {GH} \) different channel areas contribute to \( I_\mathrm {CP} \). For pulse (a) only for the lightly doped regions near the source and the drain contribute to \( I_\mathrm {CP} \). Therefore the effective length is \( L_\mathrm {eff,a} \). For pulse (b) a broader region, in- cluding the central region of the channel, contributes to \( I_\mathrm {CP} \). Therefore the effective length is \( L_\mathrm {eff,b} \). Figure source: [112].

For the calculation of \( I_\mathrm {CP} \), it has to be considered that dependent on the chosen \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) and \( V_\mathrm {GH} \) only a particular fraction of the channel is probed during a gate pulse as shown in Figure 3.6 with two pulses (a) and (b) [112]. Due to the lateral doping profile along the channel (regions near source and drain are typically lightly doped) the local \( V_{\mathrm {th}} \) and \( V_\mathrm {FB} \) differ along the channel. The requirement for driving one particular lateral position from accumulation to inversion is met if \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) and \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)\( > \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \) at this position. Pulse (a) meets this requirement only for the lightly doped regions near the source and the drain but not for the central region because \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)\( < \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \). Summing up the length of the regions, which contribute to \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) for pulse (a) results in the effective length \( L_\mathrm {eff,a} \). By contrast, pulse (b) meets the requirement for a broader lateral range, including the central region of the channel, resulting in an effective length \( L_\mathrm {eff,b} \). In this regard, the effective area, which corresponds to the fraction of the channel probed during the gate pulse, can be calculated according to

(3.7) \begin{equation} \label {eq:effarea} A_\mathrm {G,eff}(V_\mathrm {GL},V_\mathrm {GH})=W\cdot L_\mathrm {eff}(V_\mathrm {GL},V_\mathrm {GH})
\end{equation}

with

\( A_\mathrm {G,eff} \) active channel area
\( L_\mathrm {eff} \) effective channel length
\( W \) gate width.

Figure 3.7:  Constant amplitude CP method: \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) is swept through a broad voltage range from \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) to \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( > \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \) while rise time (\( t_\mathrm {r} \)), fall time (\( t_\mathrm {f} \)) and pulse am- plitude (\( \Delta V_\mathrm {G} \)) are constant as shown on the left hand side. \( I_\mathrm {CP} \)(\( V_\mathrm {GL} \)) shown on the right hand side increases with increasing \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) as long as \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \), is at its maximum when both \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) and \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)\( > \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \) are fulfilled, and finally decreases with further increase of \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) when only \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( > \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) is satisfied. Figure source: [112].

Finally, the charge pumping current can be written as [110, 112]

(3.8) \begin{equation} \label {eq:cpcurrent} I_\mathrm {CP} = W f q \int _{0}^{L_\mathrm {eff}(V_\mathrm {GL},V_\mathrm {GH})} \mathrm {d}x \int
_{E_\mathrm {em,h}}^{E_\mathrm {em,e}} \mathrm {d} E D_\mathrm {it}(E,x) \end{equation}

with

\( f \) pulse frequency
\( q \) electron charge
\( W \) gate width
\( E_\mathrm {em,h} \) / \( E_\mathrm {em,e} \) boundary in the lower / upper half of the bandgap
\( D_\mathrm {it} \) interface-state density.

The measurable \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) depends on the active energy interval, which is affected by experimental parameters like \( t_\mathrm {r} \) and \( t_\mathrm {f} \) of the pulse, the \( \Delta V_\mathrm {G} \) as well as \( T \). This allows for an energetic profiling by modification of the experimental parameters. Moreover, due to the fact that \( V_{\mathrm {th}} \) and \( V_\mathrm {FB} \) depend on the lateral position in the MOSFET, the spatial distribution of interface defects can also be analyzed. As a result, different CP techniques have been proposed [112].

For example, the constant amplitude CP technique uses a variable \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) and constant \( t_\mathrm {r} \), \( t_\mathrm {f} \) and \( \Delta V_\mathrm {G} \) as shown in Figure 3.7. \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) is swept through a broad voltage range from \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) to \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( > \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \). This leads to an \( I_\mathrm {CP} \)(\( V_\mathrm {GL} \)) which shows first an increasing behavior with increasing \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) as long as \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \). Then the charge pumping current reaches its maximum when both \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) and \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)\( > \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \) are fulfilled. Finally \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) decreases with further increase of \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) when only \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( > \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) is satisfied. In this technique, the active energy interval remains constant but in fact, different channel areas contribute to \( I_\mathrm {CP} \), depending on \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) and \( \Delta V_\mathrm {G} \) as shown in Figure 3.6 schematically. Although it seems quite advantageous to distinguish between contributions of central interface defects and defects in the lightly doped regions based on the \( I_\mathrm {CP} \)(\( V_\mathrm {GL} \)) shape, such a characterization technique remains qualitative because the particular effective channel area (\( A_\mathrm {G,eff} \)) contributing to \( I_\mathrm {CP} \) at each \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) is unknown.

By contrast, \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) remains at a fixed value for the whole measurement satisfying \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) while \( V_\mathrm {GH} \) is swept through a broad voltage range. As a consequence, \( A_\mathrm {G,eff} \) is a function of \( V_\mathrm {GH} \) only, which leads to a probing of the channel from outside to inside in a symmetrical way if \( V_\mathrm {GH} \) is swept from \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)\( < \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) to \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)\( > \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \). In order to distinguish between local and energetic information, the active energy interval defined by the energy boundaries given in the Equations 3.5 and 3.6 has to be fixed. This is realized by adapting \( t_\mathrm {r} \) and \( t_\mathrm {f} \) after every \( V_\mathrm {GH} \) step as a compensation of the increasing \( \Delta V_\mathrm {G} \). Pure energetic profiling is enabled if \( V_\mathrm {GL} \) and \( V_\mathrm {GH} \) are fixed at \( V_\mathrm {GL} \)\( \ll   \)\( V_\mathrm {FB} \) and \( V_\mathrm {GH} \)\( \gg   \)\( V_{\mathrm {th}} \), respectively, and either \( t_\mathrm {r} \) or \( t_\mathrm {f} \) are changed. Furthermore, by variation of \( T \) the active energy interval can be broadened or narrowed.

Both, energetic and position profiling of defects at the interface, typically realized with standard equipment, has made the CP method a widely used characterization technique. It gives a deep insight into degradation mechanisms associated with an increase of interface defects, typically HCD.

« PreviousUpNext »Contents
Previous: 3 Experimental Characterization    Top: 3 Experimental Characterization    Next: 3.3 Capacitance-Voltage Profiling (C-V)