next up previous contents
Next: 1.2 Devices for RF Up: 1. Introduction Previous: 1. Introduction

1.1 Radio Frequency

The abbreviation of radio frequency RF is used both as noun and as a qualifier as seen for example in RF devices. Actually, the distinction between RF and other objects is based on different historical considerations, such as the bandwidth-based, frequency-based, application-based, and size-based definition [95]:

Bandwidth-Based Definition: RF amplifiers are treated synonymously with tuned amplifiers, implicating that RF circuits are necessarily narrow-band ones with bandwidths of a small-fraction of the center frequency. This definition is not much in use any more today.
Frequency-Based Definition: RF is frequently defined as the range of electro-magnetic waves lying between the low-frequency and the microwave frequency bands, thus consisting of the three frequency bands:
Application-Based Definition: Especially in communication system engineering, RF is distinguished by considering the role of the signals at these frequencies. RF signals were historically used as carriers rather than containing information. Whereas an amplifier extending signals from $ 600\,$kHz to $ 1600\,$kHz in the AM radio band would be an RF amplifier, a video amplifier having a pass-band from $ 50\,$Hz to $ 6\,$MHz is not, since the information itself is the frequency range.
Size-Based Definition: An RF device is characterized by taking the phase shift of a signal, occurring over the extent of the device, into account. Compared to the wave-length of the electro-magnetic wave, the size of RF devices is not negligible.

The qualifier RF is used to refer to the frequency range lying just below the microwave range. But this definition is inconsistent with the term RFIC (Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits) referring to integrated circuits operating at the millimeter and sub-millimeter wave frequencies. Furthermore, signals are referred as RF from the AM band to the sub-millimeter and even IR region. For that reason, microwave would be a sub-range of RF and the distinction between RF and microwave would be obsolete. Though problematic, the phrase RF and microwave is very popular [95].

As RF cannot be properly defined by etymological and historical considerations, the most rational basis for defining RF seems to be a feature-based definition. So the distinction between the RF and non-RF objects is based on required design considerations [95], such as phase shift, reactances, dissipation, noise, radiation, reflections, and nonlinearity. That set of issues combines any kind of device employed from LF up to IR ranges.


next up previous contents
Next: 1.2 Devices for RF Up: 1. Introduction Previous: 1. Introduction

S. Wagner: Small-Signal Device and Circuit Simulation