next up previous contents
Next: 6.5 Influence of Backside Doping on the CG(VGS) Characteristics Up: 6 Applications Previous: 6.3.3 Optimization of Millimeter Wave HEMTs


6.4 Comparison between Low Noise, Power, and Millimeter Wave HEMTs

In Table 6.6 the values A1, A2 and A3 of the low noise HEMT A, the power HEMT and the millimeter wave HEMTs with dGC = 10 nm and dGC = 13 nm are compared. A1 accounts purely for the fringe capacitance in the semiconductor. For all HEMTs with a delta doping a value of about 120 fF/mm is obtained. Due to the homogeneously doped supply layer of the low noise HEMT this value is increased significantly to almost 180 fF/mm.
 

 
Table 6.6 Coefficients of contributions to the total gate capacitance CG.
A1 [fF/mm]
A2 [fF/mm]
A3 [nF/mm2]
Low noise HEMT
177
66
2.4
Power HEMT
115
85
3.2
Millimeter wave HEMT dGC = 10 nm
114
68
5.1
Millimeter wave HEMT dGC = 13 nm
123
69
4.3
 

The low noise HEMT and both millimeter wave HEMTs have self-aligned gate contacts with similar shapes of the T­gate. This results in very similar values for A2 of these devices. Only A2 for the power HEMT without a self-aligned gate is strongly increased due to the T­gate shape as discussed in Section 6.2.

The different values for A3 reflect the different electron sheet charge densities in the channels of the devices. The low noise HEMT is the only device with a GaAs barrier below the channel. This is combined with better transport properties assumed in the simulation for the channel compared to the double heterojunction HEMTs. Thus, the lowest A3 is obtained for the low noise HEMT. The largest A3 is found for the device with the smallest dGC as discussed in Section 6.3.2.2.
 



next up previous contents
Next: 6.5 Influence of Backside Doping on the CG(VGS) Characteristics Up: 6 Applications Previous: 6.3.3 Optimization of Millimeter Wave HEMTs

Helmut Brech
1998-03-11