3.3 Dielectric Response

We compare our TB results with first principles calculations introduced in Sec. 3.1.1. The optical polarization vector is assumed to be along the transport direction similar to the assumption made in the TB calculation.

Figure 3.4(a) exhibits εi(ω) and the JDOS of AGNR20BN40. In the energy range 0 < ω < 2 eV the JDOS has maxima at ω = 0.3019, 0.62214, 0.92657, 0.91883, 1.2289,1.5256, and 1.7349 eV. However, only four of these maxima (ω = 0.3019, 0.91883,0.92657, and 1.5256 eV) appear in εi(ω). From the electronic band-structure in Fig. 3.4(b) it can be shown that the peaks in εi(ω) are related to transitions from nv = 1 to nc = 1 (A), nv = 1 to nc = 3 (B), nv = 2 to nc = 2 (C), and nv = 2 to nc = 4 (D). Disappeared peaks in εi(ω) are due to zero momentum matrix elements in Eq. 3.4. This transition rule confirms previous results which are explained by the symmetry properties of the wave functions.

Figure 3.4(a) compares the dielectric functions of an AGNR20BN40 obtained from TB and first principle calculations. Excellent agreement between these results confirms the transition rules obtained from TB calculations. The energy of the first peak matches well, however, the discrepancies increase for higher peaks. This behavior is related to the differences between the predicted energy-gaps obtained from SIESTA and TB at higher energies, see Fig. 3.4(b).


PIC

Figure 3.4: (a) The dielectric function of an AGNR20BN40 based on TB (solid line) and first principle calculations (dashed line). The inset shows the related JDOS using the TB model. (b) The electronic band-structure of an AGNR20BN40 from TB (solid line) and first principle calculations (red dotted line).

In order to investigate AGNRs/BN for photodetection application, we study the quantum efficiency defined as α = (Iph∕q ) (Pop∕ℏ ω), where Iph is the photo current and Pop is the incident optical power. We assumed that all absorbed photons contribute to the photo current, such that the quantum efficiency can be calculated from the dielectric function (Eq. 3.4). A quantum efficiency of 6 - 16% for graphene is reported in Ref.  [82] and a maximum quantum efficiency ranging from 9% to 11% is reported for H-AGNRs in Ref.  [171]. Figure 3.5 shows the calculated quantum efficiency as a function of the incident photon energy at various GNR widths. The efficiency is maximized when the photon energy matches the bandgap of the nanoribbon (the first peak for each structure). Our results indicate a peak of quantum efficiency in the range of 14 - 15% for AGNRs/BN. The quantum efficiencies of photodetectors based on AGNRs/BN and H-AGNRs are compared in Fig. 3.5. Due to the presence of more allowed transitions a wider absorption spectrum is achieved in AGNRs/BN compared to H-AGNRs. As a H-AGNR with index 8 is metallic, the first peak is related to the second energy-gap and appears at 2.88 eV whereas the AGNR8BN30 shows three peaks below that energy due to energy-gap opening, see Fig. 3.5(a). In Fig. 3.5, the quantum efficiency decreases for the first energies, but increases at higher energies, see for example the sixth peak for AGNR33BN30 (Fig. 3.5(c)). This is due to different effective masses of different subbands which affect the JDOS. According to Eq. 3.4, a larger JDOS leads to a larger absorption of photons and a higher quantum efficiency.

We also investigate the photoresponsivity given by (Iph∕Pop ). Our calculations give an upper limit for the photoresponsivities of 0.336 A/W, 0.239 A/W, and 0.202 A/W for photon energies near the bandgaps of AGNR8BN30, AGNR16BN30, and AGNR33BN30 respectively. Due to the higher quantum efficiency of AGNRs/BN compared to AGNRs, a higher photoresponsivity is obtained for the same input optical power of 107 W/m2.


PIC

Figure 3.5: The quantum efficiency of an (a) AGNR8BN30, (b) AGNR16BN30, and (c) AGNR33BN30 compared to a H-AGNRs with the same indices.