The proposed cavity model for the simulation of the parallelplane field inside the enclosure has been optimized for this purpose by a reduction of the general Maxwell equations in Chapter 4. This reduction is only admissible under the conditions (4.4) and (4.5), which are fulfilled inside the enclosure, but not in the external device environment. Thus, an interface between the cavity model and another simulation model of the external environment is necessary for the consideration of external influences on the internal cavity field. An interface which enables separate simulations of the external and the internal model and an integration of both simulation results in a common network simulation is established by utilizing equivalent source theory. Figure 6.1 depicts the subject of equivalent source theory, that the external field outside of an object is preserved, when the object is replaced by a PMC object of the same shape with electric currents on the surface, which are obtained from the initial field. Alternatively, the object can be replaced by a PEC object with magnetic currents on the surface, also preserving the external field [102].

Another valid model preserves the field inside the object and replaces the external
environment of the object by PMC material and electric currents on the object surface.
PEC in the volume outside of the object and magnetic currents on the object surface will
preserve the internal fields accordingly. A PMC surface with an electric surface current
is, from a circuit point of view, equivalent to an ideal current source, while a PEC
surface with a magnetic surface current is equivalent to an ideal voltage source.
The described equivalent source theory enables a general simulation domain separation
with every standard fullwave simulation tool that supports PMC boundary conditions and
electric current ports, or PEC boundary conditions and magnetic current ports.
A separate domain simulation of the internal and the external domains of an object and
integration of both results can be performed with the following simulation procedure:
Alternatively to a PMC boundary together with an electric current port, PEC boundaries
together with magnetic current ports may also be used. Since the external and the
internal simulation are separated, the external simulation can be performed with either
PMC boundaries together with electric current ports, or PEC boundaries together with
magnetic current ports, while the internal simulation can be performed with a different
boundary and port current definition. The described procedure is general and can be
performed on every threedimensional object. The number of ports which have to be
arranged along the object's surface to obtain accurate results depends on the maximum
frequency of the simulation and the object size. Ports must not be declared on metallic
walls of the object. High frequency fields decay rapidly inside a metallic wall and
cannot excite the other domain. Therefore, these surfaces are modeled as they are. This
significantly reduces the necessary number of surface ports, if the object is an metallic
enclosure. At slim enclosure apertures ports must only be arranged perpendicular to the
slot edges, due to the vanishing electric field tangential along the metallic edges.
Thus, this domain separation approach is efficient for emission and shielding
effectiveness simulations even on large metallic enclosures.
The inner domain of devices as described in Chapter 1 is
simulated by using the cavity model (4.13) with PMC boundaries at
the slot surfaces and multiple ports between the upper and lower planes just in front of
the PMC surface inside the enclosure. The result of this simulation is an impedance
matrix (4.17) model of the internal device domain. Although energy
dissipation is caused by radiation and coupling to cables from enclosure slots, the PMC
boundary condition is a much more realistic model of the slot than a PEC boundary. An
enclosure model with PMC surfaces and no surface current ports does not consider
emissions from the slot. However, this ideal model has nearly the same cavity modes as a
model that considers the emissions, and thus provides good first order information about
the resonance frequencies. Therefore, it is proposed to implement the interface at the
slots with a PMC boundary condition and electric currents on the slot surface.
Another simulation has to be performed for the external device domain using PMC or PEC
boundaries at the slots with electric or magnetic current ports respectively at the same
slot positions, but outside of the enclosure.
Every available threedimensional fullwave simulation tool can be used for this
simulation. The results of both the internal model and the external model simulations are
combined in a network simulation program according to the previously described procedure.
As an alternative to the numerical simulation of the external enclosure domain, an
analytical model for the free space radiation loss is obtained in
Section 7.2, utilizing magnetic current sources at the
slot. A port admittance matrix from this analytical solution is introduced into the
cavity model for the consideration of the slot radiation in the calculation of the field
on the inside of the enclosure. With the field on the enclosure slot and the external
free space radiation solution, the radiation of the slot from a slim enclosure is
expressed analytically. This purely analytical application of the domain decomposition
method provides a powerful method for predesign investigations.
Advantages of the proposed domain decomposition approach:
C. Poschalko: The Simulation of Emission from Printed Circuit Boards under a Metallic Cover