Fig. 4.9 shows that the effective masses along and become different for decreasing film thickness. The dependence of the effective masses of the two ground subbands without strain on film thickness is shown in Fig. 4.10. However, due to symmetry restrictions their subband energy dispersion relations are not parabolic as demonstrated in Fig. 4.11. For a given and there is a subband with a lower energy in the form of the unification of two equienergy ellipses with the effective masses and and a subband which is higher in energy given by the intersection of the same ellipses. The difference between the bulk description and the numerically obtained thickness dependent result is caused by the growing value of the righthand side in (4.22), which cannot be neglected for thin films. The coupling between the two conduction bands in (4.1) is described via the righthand side of (4.22) and therefore of great importance for thin films. The two bands exhibit minima at with respect to the corresponding point. One can think of the coupling between the bands as interaction between the valleys. This interaction is caused by the term and is also responsible for the nonparabolicity of the bulk bands.
Substituting ^{4.1} into (4.22) and solving for small strain the dispersion relation for the unprimed subbands n can be obtained:
