« PreviousUpNext »Contents
Previous: 5.3 Bias dependence of the recovery    Top: 5 Bias dependence of degradation and recovery    Next: 5.5 Conclusions - Bias dependence of the shifts

5.4 Bias dependence of the \( \Delta V_\textrm {TH} \) extraction

The occupancy of interface states can follow changes in (math image) quasi instantaneously (SRH theory), with the fastest response times being in the pico- and nano-second range and the slowest response times for traps located at midgap in the millisecond regime [152], both outside our measurement window. Oxide traps, on the other hand, are expected to require a longer time interval to restore equilibrium with the silicon substrate since a large quantum mechanical barrier has to be overcome by elastic or inelastic tunneling. Also, charging and discharging is likely to be accompanied by structural relaxation [110, 102, 153]. Generally this means, that if the Fermi level is changed abruptly (for example when we switch the gate bias from stress level to (math image)) a new equilibrium condition is generated. Assuming an elastic tunneling process, stress-induced oxide traps within the energy range \( E_\mathrm {F,new} - E_\mathrm {F,old} \) would tend to become or stay positively charged while traps below \( E_\mathrm {F,new} \) would rather be neutralized. Such a ‘switching’ behavior of oxide traps was already reported for \( \mathrm {E}’ \) centers in MOS structures after irradiation [103, 101].

In Fig. 5.4, we generate such new equilibrium conditions by switching the gate bias during recovery of the NMOS and PMOS devices in a defined way between weak and deep inversion: after 10\( \,\mathrm {s} \) of recovery at \( \pm 1.1\,\mathrm {V} \) (1), we change the gate bias for another 100\( \,\mathrm {s} \) towards weaker inversion (\( \pm 0.85\,\mathrm {V} \)) (2). This moves the Fermi level immediately from the band edges closer toward midgap, cf. Fig. 5.4. A second gate bias switch from \( \pm 0.85\,\mathrm {V} \) (2) to \( \pm 0.6\,\mathrm {V} \) (3) for another 1,000\( \,\mathrm {s} \) moves the Fermi level even closer to midgap. The last recovery cycle was performed again at \( \pm 1.1\,\mathrm {V} \) (1) and lasted for 10,000\( \,\mathrm {s} \).

Figure 5.4:  \( V_\mathrm {TH} \) shift during recovery at different gate biases for the PMOS and the NMOS device. On the left hand side, the Fermi level position is illustrated for the individual gate biases. As the gate voltage drives the Fermi levels closer toward midgap (1) \( \rightarrow   \) (2) \( \rightarrow   \) (3), the difference in the \( V_\mathrm {TH} \) shift between the PMOS and the NMOS device decreases. After switching the gate bias from depletion back toward inversion (3) \( \rightarrow       \) (1), transients emerge as tails in the recovery curves.

According to the data shown in Fig. 5.4, a Fermi level variation toward accumulation lowers the total (math image) shift for both the NMOS and PMOS transistor. Consequently, the difference in net positive charge between NMOS and PMOS devices is reduced. Recalling the previous discussion, this is because the energy interval of electrically active charge is narrower as we bias both devices closer toward midgap. After the last bias switch from \( \pm 0.6\,\mathrm {V} \) (3) back to \( \pm 1.1\,\mathrm {V} \) (3), we observe a huge step in the (math image) shift indicating that previously neutralized defects can be recharged again. This behavior is typically attributed to interface states and not fully appreciated for oxide defects. Furthermore, these charges do not react instantaneously to the bias switch. Instead, moderately fast transients are observed (tails in the recovery curve) after the bias switch indicating a relatively slow (i.e. time constants in the range of several thousand seconds) dynamic carrier exchange process which may be due to inelastic tunneling between oxide defects and the silicon substrate. SRH recombination of interface states or elastic tunneling would be definitely too fast to produce recovery tails within our experimental time resolution.

« PreviousUpNext »Contents
Previous: 5.3 Bias dependence of the recovery    Top: 5 Bias dependence of degradation and recovery    Next: 5.5 Conclusions - Bias dependence of the shifts